Is MV Godzilla a inherently pro-nuclear metaphor?

Godzilla Forum Topic

Gmkgoji

MemberRodanNovember 05, 201916258 Views82 Replies

In Godzilla king of the monsters, Serzawa uses a nuke to revive Godzilla, therefore allowing Godzilla to fight King ghidorah again. Simply put, the nuke is the one thing that is the saving grace in the movie. Burning Godzilla also practically nukes the entirety of Boston to kill Ghidorah, which, though Ghidorah was defeated, Boston was entirely destroyed. Also, the radiation fallout is seen as a good thing rather than a bad thing, as the titans leave behind radiation that bolsters plant life. HOWEVER, the original 1954 film portrayed the nuclear fallout as a horrific thing. The two films differ vastly in terms of the view Nuclear energy/power. Is Godzilla: king of the monsters saying Nuclear power is a nessacary evil?

Zwei Wing is the best singing duo. Change my mind.

Other discussions started by Gmkgoji

Replies to Is MV Godzilla a inherently pro-nuclear metaphor?

Titan of Water
Group: Member
Rank: Baragon
View Profile

Titan of WaterApril 27, 2020

Problem with modern environmentalism is that people want their governments to save the planet for them instead of doing something themselves.

Angering the Godzilla fan base one take at a time

RosaP
Group: Member
Rank: Mothra Larvae
View Profile

RosaPMarch 30, 2021

Unfortunately, yes. It seems to be so. Cleaning of the environment must start from the house cleaning. Of our personal one. But if I have tried a couple of different variants in my house. Only this one worked. And only in such a process. So if you need to get the clean way here, it is better to start with these guys help and enjoy your favorite film while they are doing the work they are the best in.

Are you an avid Godzilla fan looking for a dedicated online community of likeminded fans? Look no further! Create your own profile today and take part in our forums and gain XP points for all the content you post!