would you have liked this design over the 2014 design?

I can't see the image. :T

fixed it

No, the 2014 design is easily one of the best of the whole series. Its unique, its Badass, and its Godzilla. Could not have asked for more.

Also, 2014 could easily destroy this thing, it may look aggressive but its no where near the sheer aggression and strength of 2014.

we never really got to see this guy at work so i cant really say if he could actually beat 2014 in a fight so im leaving that open for debate

i mean deadly as in blood thirsty by the way. this one looks like he wont walk past you if you shoot at him

Yeah I'd probably have liked this design more.

That actually in a way makes him less intelligent then 2014, 2014 didnt attack the millitary cause he was on a mission and also he didnt really care what they tried to do cause it wasnt hurting him.

i wouldnt say it didnt hurt him i mean it was enough to make him stumble into the bridge but i do agree with you it would be smarter stay on the task at hand

I like the 2014 design a lot more, but i do find the 94 cool. Except for one part; The legs. The legs on the statue are, exscuse my language, GOD AWFULL. Those small, thin toes just looks wrong. And the way the legs are bend just comes off as way too dinosaurian(is that word? JP fans help me here). And i dont really like that.

i think it was to make this one faster. this was kind of the older cooler brother to the zilla design    

Designed by the late great Stan Winston. I like some aspects of it better than 2014. I actually like the legs and feet, although I would have beefed them up a bit more. It was definitely meant to be more dinosaur-like. I would love to have seen this in action. It would have been much better than the GINO/Zilla design that was eventually used.

I don't know that I prefer this over 2014 or vice versa. They're both decent but nowhere near perfect, and not close to my favorites.

It's about on par with the design we got, really. Like the 2014 design, it's not a perfect depiction of Godzilla, but it's clearly Godzilla.

@Gman2887 - Absolutely.

There is no truly perfect design of Godzilla. Except for the original one of '54. That one is perfect, no questions asked :3

Anyways...... I find this design to just feel a bit too much like a dinosaur as well as not enough rough and tough scales. The 2014 version suits a huge beast of ancient proportions, a modern version of the big guy we all love that looks great in his CGI glory. And if a giant monster could exist, the 2014 design makes you think:

'Oh, wow, that looks like it could really exist!'

I like this design, but I prefer LegendaryGoji.

Here's some higher-quality photos of that same design.

The enemy creature from the cancelled American 1994 Godzilla film, Gryphon

I don't really agree with Gman123's assumption that the 2014 design makes one think, "oh wow it could really exist" any more or less than the previous incarnations or the unused 1994 design.

I do think that the '54 is the perfect incarnation though. It set the bar for everything after the fact.

Gman- i dont know, when you think of a real life Godzilla, it may just be due to the it being the first CGI American Godzilla but i think 2014 is the closest to an actual real life Godzilla we can get.

All the others look way to unreal, Legendary's still looks unreal, but if there were to be a Godzilla it would look like him.

I still don't see it. I think the use of CGI is clouding people's judgment of the design and they can't rightly see it for the design alone. If you set a 2014 figure next to, say, a 1989 figure neither is more "real" than the other. And to assume the 2014 design is the closest to a "real Godzilla" is a fairly dubious comment as it insinuates the attributes lifted from previous incarnations for this particular design weren't worth mentioning as realistic before.