What Gareth Edwards should have done for Godzilla & the MUTOs

To begin, I think Gareth Edwards deserves much credit for the outlook of the new Godzilla and the MUTOs. However at the same time, both fans and non-fans had issues with Godzilla in a number of areas, despite it being a huge hit for now. 

To be honest, even after I have watched the movie and it's been days since, scenes of the movie kept replaying in my mind, and it just didn't feel complete. Something seems to be missing, I don't know if any of you guys are also feeling the same way about Godzilla 2014. There were issues in Godzilla 2014 that kept me thinking about how the movie would have played out if these issues were improved upon. Has Gareth Edwards succeeded in making us look forward to a Godzilla sequel because he deliberately made the show feel incomplete? Or was it just plain oversight on his part on some issues that made it feel lacking in substance? It was good overall, but somehow upon leaving the theatre, something I felt is missing is the lack of a strong tone/depth to end Godzilla 2014 with.

My focus is actually on Godzilla and the MUTOs, as there were really some key areas that Gareth Edwards could have explored to leave an even bigger impression on the audiences. I'll start with Godzilla first.

Godzilla:

I say Gareth Edwards and his team nailed it on this one. The look and immensity of Godzilla really goes down well. I could see that Godzilla was designed in such a way that his scales were crocodilian-like, which made it believable that it could have existed. (who knows) Godzilla could even be considered a really ancient ancestor of the crocodile species? You add that sense of realism along with his majestic roar and it is really epic, and I think that's the best Godzilla roar I've ever heard.

The issues:

1)  I think disappointment with Godzilla stems from the fact that throughout the course of marketing the movie especially during the initial stages, Godzilla was portrayed as a "Destroyer of Worlds". Many early scenes suggested an apocalyse for mankind, or facing Godzilla's wrath, which led people to incline their expectations of Godzilla in this direction, similar to the dark tonality of the 1954 verson. After watching the movie, its clear that Godzilla is nowhere near such a portrayal, and he turns out to be sort of a hero/anti-hero. 

2)  Godzilla's portrayal as a Force of Nature is fine, provided they actually stick to his animalistic instincts, but in the movie, Godzilla is being almost too 'courteous' with the humans, that apart from just tearing apart the Golden Gate Bridge, you do not actually see Godzilla kill any humans on sight. It doesn't help at all that Godzilla made no response to the attacks of the military which felt very unrealistic. To put it in this perspective, even for a human, if you are bitten by a swarm of ants coming at your feet, (sure, ants can't kill you but) the natural instinct would be to swat them off to or kill them. For Godzilla not to do that to the humans in the face of projectiles coming at him? - its really surprising that he did nothing. It's as if Godzilla has this consciousness in him that humans do not deserved to be killed, which to me, is one step in the wrong direction if Godzilla is supposed to be a Force to be reckoned with. Going forward, humans will no longer fear Godzilla because he appears to be on the side of the them. So again, we get another misportrayal - He isn't a destroyer of worlds, nor is he an anti-hero. He's now a kind heroic monster like Gamera? I mean even natural forces of Nature like real tsunamis, earthquakes and typhoons do not discern between humans and what to wreck. This portrayal of Godzilla now would completely detract from the theme of showcasing the horrors of nuclear power.

For these two points mentioned above, I can understand why some people are clearly displeased with the movie, and felt misled. I personally think Godzilla is a bit too kind in this movie, which does not benefit his reputation. 

The MUTOS

I think the MUTOs are a masterpiece in a league of their own, and certainly very well-designed. In fact they just made it to the top of my favorite list of Godzilla adversaries, alongside Biollante, Mothra & Battra. When the MUTOs first demonstrated their ability to project EMPs, I thought it was a really cool idea, which is devastating to humans and their technology, and you do realize with such an ability, the MUTOs could literally eat the nuclear-powered Jaegers in Pacific Rim for lunch, and render even the more powerful Mark-4 & 5 Jaegers to nothing but statues. While I have no complains about the MUTOs, there were some areas that Gareth E. could have capitalized on the MUTOs to better demonstrate their prowess. 

The issues:

1) During the scene when the flying MUTO emerged from the Janjira site, an earthquake was reported. My thought was, if the MUTO could project an EMP so wide that it covers an area of 5 miles, surely it must have the ability to create a small earthquake of sorts with its claws. I thought it would have been very appropriate if Gareth E. associated the MUTOs with the ability to shatter the ground and create earthquakes, which would have made them so much more powerful. If the Male MUTO had no such ability, surely the Female MUTO, given its size should have the means to do so. However the ability to create an earthquake was surprisingly not accorded to the MUTOs. I would like to think of the MUTOs as gigantic versions of present-day Mantis Shrimps, where the claws may appear ordinary, but they pack a tremendous punch when used for attacking. 

2) The reason why I felt it necessary to project the MUTOs' power was because clearly there were people saying that they felt Godzilla was ridiculously weak against the MUTOs, which didn't make sense since Godzilla could take on kiloton nuclear bombs right in the face in 1954, while here, Godzilla was collapsing to the pummelling of the MUTOs, which only have EMP capabilities. I thought if Gareth E. had demonstrated the MUTOs' ability to shatter the ground and create earthquakes with their claws to disrupt Godzilla's movements, it would have made the fighting scenes more epic, and at the same time, the pain felt by Godzilla would have been more apparent to the audience. 

My Conclusion:

If Godzilla isn't the Destroyer of Worlds, but a Force of Nature, then make it convincing enough to show he is one, because right now he is neither, nor is he an anti-hero. He just seems like a good old monster now. If the MUTOs had demonstrated more devastating attacks, the fight scenes would have been really epic, and Godzilla would also appear more powerful against his foes. In this way, its a two-way benefit for both Godzilla and the MUTOs' image.

Thank you if you have taken the time to read up to this point, it would be nice to hear from you people how you think Godzilla or the MUTOs could have been portrayed to make it a better movie. :)